Some of those that burn crosses, are the same that hold office. |
You know I don’t do the political rant thing often. I always have my ear against the door, but barely ever do I walk into that chaos on the other side. The past week has been too much for me, and I’m falling in. I’m interested from a banking/economy, a current government side, as well as a presidential campaign perspective. Honestly, and this will probably be the first time I’ve ever said it, you should be too. There’s a lot going on right now, and it’s hard to keep a check on all the pulses.
Presidential Campaign – This is the easy one. John McCain is an idiot. He’s either too old to multi-task, or he’s too stupid to think clearly. This dude is obviously not fit to be president. We already have someone that quits to go relax, do we really need another? He doesn’t know what he’s doing, and it shows. Last week he says the economy is still strong. Saturday a 3 page proposal is released to congress to review as a solution for the financial crisis. Monday, McCain says stuff is going to hit the fan. Tuesday, Mccain says he hasn’t read the 3 page document yet. Wednesday, he cancels his appearance on Letterman and says that he wants to postpone the debate and his campaign so he can focus on fixing the crisis. Ego trip much? He ends up staying in
Current Government – We’re starting to see the true colors of what goes on in our nation’s capital. These people have no accountability, and they slack off their whole careers, and when it comes time to get your crap together and do something, they don’t know how to work together. Henry Paulson apparently begged on 1 knee to the democrats not to tell the presses how bad the meetings went. Bush is actually doing something it seems, at least trying to get everyone to work together and encouraging discussion. What we have though are people from 2 different sides of the fence. You have people with big business and money backgrounds (who, in my opinion should not be allowed to be in politics) like Henry Paulson, and then you have people that have pure legislative backgrounds who know nothing about the market crisis, or how to appropriately manage it. You know this $700 billion number that’s been tossed around? Ask someone where they came up with that number. A Treasury spokeswoman says:
“It’s not based on any particular data point,” a Treasury spokeswoman told Forbes.com Tuesday. “We just wanted to choose a really large number.”
OMG. Are we serious??? We have no idea what we’re dealing with here. Enter malfeasance probe. We’re actually going back to the businesses that are in trouble and looking for fraud. That won’t take long.
Back on track to progressive thinking though, is this really what we want to do? These companies knew their loans were risky, but they went in anyway. Preying on poor people to meet their self-serving pockets. If the government buys all these loans, it doesn’t just end there either. Now we’re looking at the government serving a role it’s never had. It actually has potential to MAKE money in this deal…but is this a good thing?!?! It’s like a whole form of backdoor taxation that I do not approve of. If you need me to spell it out for you, the government will pay, we’ll say, 1 trillion, for debts that are worth more than 2.2 trillion fully matured. Do we really want our government acting for a profit? That money is coming from home owners and normal people. That brings a whole new level of shadiness and potential for cover ups that I’m not comfortable with.
Economy/business – Cluster ****. That’s pretty accurate. Already in the shadows is the fact that we’re letting Morgan Stanley & Goldman Sachs change their status from investment banks to bank holding companies. While I don’t disagree with this solution, it’s scary. By changing their status, they become regulated by the Federal Reserve, but they also have more access to borrow more money. These are the last and largest investment banks and brings them into the 4th and 6th largest bank holding companies. I’m worried about their practices, or their problems, becoming contagious and bringing down the bank holding or asset management areas of banking. By association alone, the market is cracking. BNY Mellon has very limited exposure to any of the bad debt that is in the news, but our stock, with everyone else, is falling. We’re even throwing $425 million to help out Lehman’s crash because they’re stock is falling below $1/share. We’ve got Wamu going under and being bought out so that they don’t deplete FIDC funds. That’s nuts! We’re going to be left with a dozen or so big banks. It’s like a survival of the fittest scenario, only with a global scale economy. If these companies get the bailout they’re after from the government, no one pays but the American people. Some heads need to roll for sure, and they better have CEO next to their names.
I’m starting to hear about a new government plan now to insure the debts instead of just buying their out right. That might be a little better. This has been something on Barack’s campaign since day one. I think that about sums everything up.
I’m not writing a paper here, so i don’t care to cite anything, but I’ll give you a few links and tell you to watch the Colbert Report, the Daily show, and CNN. I’m curious to see what NPR has to say too.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08270/915335-68.stm?cmpid=generalbusiness.xml
http://video.newsweek.com/#?c=40211&l=1785302026&t=1818133680
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122230704116773989.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Raines
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Buffett
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08268/914648-100.stm
http://www.forbes.com/home/2008/09/23/bailout-paulson-congress-biz-beltway-cx_jz_bw_0923bailout.html
http://orlando.bizjournals.com/orlando/othercities/atlanta/stories/2008/09/22/daily4.html
2,989 views